Washington:
For the second time in eight years, a girl has gained the Democratic nomination for US president, solely to come back up quick in a marketing campaign the place gender was a central problem.
Like Hillary Clinton in 2016, Kamala Harris had a shot at turning into the primary girl to occupy the Oval Workplace however stumbled on the ultimate hurdle.
Whereas the charisma of their opponent — Donald Trump, in each instances — clearly performed a job in these historic defeats, many observers additionally noticed misogyny as an element.
Of their dueling campaigns, Harris and Trump laid out starkly totally different visions for ladies’s standing and rights.
Trump, who has confronted a number of accusations of sexual assault he denies, sought to broadcast a hypermasculine picture, showing alongside blended martial artists and providing reward for autocratic world leaders.
He and his marketing campaign surrogates additionally made a number of feedback that have been criticized as insulting or contemptuous of ladies.
He referred to as Harris “loopy” and “mentally disabled”, and claimed she can be “like a play toy” for different world leaders if elected.
His operating mate, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance, doubled down on a quip he made in 2021 about “childless cat women” operating the nation, saying “I’ve obtained nothing towards cats.”
Trump additionally introduced himself as a “protector” of ladies, saying he would shield them whether or not they “prefer it or not.”
Defender of ladies’s rights
Harris in contrast relied closely on feminine celebrities reminiscent of Beyonce, Jennifer Lopez, Woman Gaga and Oprah Winfrey, betting that they’d assist her attain even conservative ladies voters.
Harris didn’t marketing campaign overtly on the truth that she would have been the primary feminine president of america.
However she made the protection of ladies’s rights, and abortion specifically, one of many cornerstones of her marketing campaign.
However this seems to not have gained over sufficient reasonably conservative ladies.
At a marketing campaign rally final month, former first girl Michelle Obama denounced the obvious double commonplace by which the 2 White Home candidates have been judged.
“We count on her to be clever and articulate, to have a transparent set of insurance policies, to by no means present an excessive amount of anger, to show time and time once more that she belongs,” she mentioned of Harris.
“However for Trump, we count on nothing in any respect. No understanding of coverage, no capacity to place collectively a coherent argument, no honesty, no decency, no morals.”
(Aside from the headline, this story has not been edited by EDNBOX employees and is revealed from a syndicated feed.)