The Chief Justice inaugurated the Nationwide Judicial Museum at this time
New Delhi:
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, recognized to tug up legal professionals for breaking courtroom decorum, had an Synthetic Intelligence (AI) lawyer to take care of at this time. The interplay came about on the inauguration ceremony of the Nationwide Judicial Museum and Archive.
To check the AI lawyer’s data, the Chief Justice requested, “Is the dying penalty constitutional in India?” The AI lawyer, within the type of a spectacled man carrying an advocate’s bow tie and coat, replied, “Sure, the dying penalty is constitutional in India. It’s reserved for the rarest of uncommon circumstances as decided by the Supreme Court docket the place the crime is exceptionally heinous and warrants such a punishment.” The Chief Justice regarded impressed by the response. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, who is ready to take over as the subsequent Chief Justice on Monday, was additionally current. Different Supreme Court docket judges additionally attended the inauguration.
Talking on the event, the Chief Justice stated the brand new museum displays the ethos of the Supreme Court docket and its significance for the nation. He stated he would need the museum to grow to be an interactive house for the youthful technology. “You wish to have youthful youngsters from colleges and faculties, residents who should not essentially legal professionals and judges to return right here and breathe the air we breathe day by day within the Court docket to convey a stay expertise to them of the significance of the rule of legislation and the work which all of us as judges and legal professionals do,” he stated.
#WATCH | Delhi | On the inauguration ceremony of the Nationwide Judicial Museum and Archive (NJMA) on the Supreme Court docket, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud interacts with the ‘AI lawyer’ and asks, “Is the dying penalty constitutional in India?” pic.twitter.com/ghkK1YJCsV
— ANI (@ANI) November 7, 2024
The Chief Justice stated the museum will not be “judge-centric”. “It has segments that we noticed on the Constitutional Meeting, those that framed the Structure… the members of the Bar who contributed with their fearless advocacy to creating the Court docket what it’s at this time. And I’m certain that we will get increasingly folks right here. I request all of the members of the Bar to return and see the museum. Instantly, I hope within the subsequent week, my successor will even open up the house for the youthful technology in order that they will breathe the lifetime of justice that we breathe day by day.”
The Nationwide Judicial Museum, which has come up on the location of the erstwhile judges’ library, has grow to be some extent of rivalry between the highest courtroom’s bar affiliation, led by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, and the workplace of the Chief Justice. The legal professionals’ physique had demanded a library and lounge on the location the place the museum has come up.
“Now a museum has apparently been proposed within the erstwhile Judges Library whereas we had demanded a Library, Cafe cum Lounge for the members of the Bar as the current cafeteria is insufficient to cater to the wants of the members of the Bar. We’re involved that regardless of our objection raised towards the proposed Museum within the erstwhile Judges library, work has began for the museum,” the bar affiliation stated in a decision final month.